linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1332493291.2801.14.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com>
Date:	Fri, 23 Mar 2012 09:01:31 +0000
From:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi tree

On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 19:53 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 08:14 +0000, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > Additionally, I am the author and maintainer of that driver and I
> > don't
> > > remember ever being CCed on that patch ... or did I miss it ?
> > 
> > You missed it ... I added you and Jeff for automatic cc's when the
> > commit hit the scsi tree.
> > 
> > This is the mail log:
> > 
> > Mar 22 07:53:17 bedivere postfix/smtp[14322]: C3A1F8EE136:
> > to=<benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
> > relay=gate.crashing.org[63.228.1.57]:25, delay=2.7,
> > delays=0.13/0.12/1.3/1.2, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0
> > q2MErGNT019145 Message accepted for delivery)
> 
> Allright, Mar 22, that's yesterday (.au time)... that's a short time
> between notifying the maintainer and going into -next :-) No biggie,
> I'll have a look next week, it's just annoying to get build failure
> reports from Stephen about drivers I own for patches I never heard
> about ...

Yes, sorry ... it's one of those large all or nothing type series that
touches about 33 different drivers (about 75% of which are
unmaintained).

I would have checked the ppc compile if I still had a working ppc
machine.  Having looked through the code, I think this is the fix ...
could someone check?

James

---

diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_svw.c b/drivers/ata/sata_svw.c
index 05838bf..0bbd0cb 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/sata_svw.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/sata_svw.c
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
 #include <linux/init.h>
 #include <linux/blkdev.h>
 #include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/proc_fs.h>
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
 #include <linux/device.h>
 #include <scsi/scsi_host.h>



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/