[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120323122556.GE13920@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 13:25:56 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tj@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86: Merge x86_32 and x86_64 cpu_idle()
* Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> wrote:
> Both functions are mostly identical, so we can merge them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/idle.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c | 60 ----------------------
> arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 109 ----------------------------------------
> 4 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 169 deletions(-)
Doesn't apply on latest -tip:
patching file arch/x86/include/asm/idle.h
patching file arch/x86/kernel/process.c
Hunk #2 succeeded at 26 with fuzz 2 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 392 (offset 1 line).
patching file arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
Hunk #3 succeeded at 55 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #4 FAILED at 65.
1 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
patching file arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
Hunk #3 FAILED at 48.
1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
Is a good idea otherwise.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists