lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120323123313.GG13920@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 23 Mar 2012 13:33:13 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc:	x86@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
	hpa@...or.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
	josh@...htriplett.org, tj@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86: Merge x86_32 and x86_64 cpu_idle()


* Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> wrote:

> Am 23.03.2012 13:25, schrieb Ingo Molnar:
> >
> >* Richard Weinberger<richard@....at>  wrote:
> >
> >>Both functions are mostly identical, so we can merge them.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger<richard@....at>
> >>---
> >>  arch/x86/include/asm/idle.h  |    1 +
> >>  arch/x86/kernel/process.c    |  114 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c |   60 ----------------------
> >>  arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c |  109 ----------------------------------------
> >>  4 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 169 deletions(-)
> >
> >Doesn't apply on latest -tip:
> >
> >patching file arch/x86/include/asm/idle.h
> >patching file arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> >Hunk #2 succeeded at 26 with fuzz 2 (offset 1 line).
> >Hunk #3 succeeded at 392 (offset 1 line).
> >patching file arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
> >Hunk #3 succeeded at 55 (offset 1 line).
> >Hunk #4 FAILED at 65.
> >1 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
> >patching file arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
> >Hunk #3 FAILED at 48.
> >1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
> >
> 
> It was based on Linus' tree.

The conflicts were against Linus's tree - the merge window added 
new code there.

> I'll rebase it on -tip.

Thanks!

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ