linux-kernel - Re: GFS2: Pre-pull patch posting (merge window)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120323.154618.266106775092146713.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 23 Mar 2012 15:46:18 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	teigland@...hat.com
Cc:	swhiteho@...hat.com, rdunlap@...otime.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cluster-devel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: GFS2: Pre-pull patch posting (merge window)

From: David Teigland <teigland@...hat.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 15:41:52 -0400

> Why does gfs2 Kconfig bother with SCTP at all?  It seems that line should
> just be removed.  I'll also remove EXPERIMENTAL.  I don't understand the
> vagaries of Kconfig, so a dumb question, how could sctp_do_peeloff
> possibly be undefined if we're selecting SCTP.

GFS2=y SCTP=m
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/