[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ADE657CA350FB648AAC2C43247A983F0020696D48E3E@AUSP01VMBX24.collaborationhost.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 21:19:10 -0500
From: H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@...ionengravers.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@....fi>,
Rafal Prylowski <prylowski@...asoft.pl>
CC: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"vinod.koul@...el.com" <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
"rmallon@...il.com" <rmallon@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] ep93xx: Implement double buffering for M2M DMA channels
On Wednesday, March 21, 2012 12:39 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 09:09:26AM +0100, Rafal Prylowski wrote:
>> Implement double buffering for M2M DMA channels.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rafal Prylowski <prylowski@...asoft.pl>
>
> The subject line prefix should probably be 'dmaengine/ep93xx_dma: ' but
> otherwise this looks good.
>
> Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@....fi>
Mika,
Did you test this patch or just review it?
On my system it doesn't work. I think it has something to do with the
changes to m2m_hw_interrupt but I haven't tracked it down yet.
It looks like what's missing is a:
edmac->edma->hw_submit(edmac);
But, maybe that's not needed with double buffering?
Regards,
Hartley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists