linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] DMA-mapping framework updates for 3.4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFy9oxMrfm-+deMqV=XnFOa98aKXqW+8PR-P-zOARtC2BQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 23 Mar 2012 14:35:48 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
	microblaze-uclinux@...e.uq.edu.au, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	x86@...nel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, discuss@...-64.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] DMA-mapping framework updates for 3.4

On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Marek Szyprowski
<m.szyprowski@...sung.com> wrote:
>
>  git://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-samsung dma-mapping-next
>
> Those patches introduce a new alloc method (with support for memory
> attributes) in dma_map_ops structure, which will later replace
> dma_alloc_coherent and dma_alloc_writecombine functions.

So I'm quite unhappy with these patches.

Here's just the few problems I saw from some *very* quick look-through
of the git tree:

 - I'm not seeing ack's from the architecture maintainers for the
patches that change some architecture.

 - Even more importantly, what I really want is acks and comments from
the people who are expected to *use* this.

 - it looks like patches break compilation half-way through the
series. Just one example I noticed: the "x86 adaptation" patch changes
the functions in lib/swiotlb.c, but afaik ia64 *also* uses those. So
now ia64 is broken until a couple of patches later. I suspect there
are other examples like that.

 - the sign-off chains are odd. What happened there? Several patches
are signed off by Kyungmin Park, but he doesn't seem to be "in the
chain" at all. Whazzup? (*)

(Btw, I notice the same thing in the tree I pulled from Dave Airlie,
btw - what the F is going on with samsung submissions - those are
marked as committed by Dave Airlie, and don't have Dave in the
sign-off chain at all!)

 - Finally, how/why are "dma attributes" different from the per-device
dma limits ("device_dma_parameters")

Hmm?

                  Linus

(*) Btw, I notice the same thing in the tree I pulled from Dave
Airlie, btw - what the F is going on with samsung submissions - those
are marked as committed by Dave Airlie, and don't have Dave in the
sign-off chain at all! Dave?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/