[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F6C170A.4070305@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 11:54:10 +0530
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] config: simplify INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK
On 03/22/2012 03:25 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> From: Raghavendra K T<raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Patch simplifies current INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK. compile tested on x86_64
>
> Change log:
> get rid of INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK entirely replacing it with UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK
> instead with the reverse meaning.
>
> whover wants to uninline the spinlocks (like spinlock debugging, paravirt etc
> all just do select UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK
typo:
Whoever wants to uninline the spinlocks (like spinlock debugging,
paravirt etc) just do select UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK.
>
> Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T<raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> Please refer : https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/21/357
Linus, Please let me know if this is what you were looking for or Did I
really mess it up :(
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists