[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120324141251.GA25980@infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:12:51 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hch@...radead.org,
Trond.Myklebust@...app.com, sfrench@...ba.org, sage@...dream.net,
ericvh@...il.com, mszeredi@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/25] vfs: split __dentry_open()
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 10:22:20PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
>
> Split __dentry_open() into two functions:
>
> do_dentry_open() - does most of the actual work, doesn't put file on failure
> open_check_o_direct() - after a successful open, checks direct_IO method
>
> This will allow i_op->atomic_open to do just the file initialization and leave
> the direct_IO checking to the VFS.
I think the O_DIRECT checks should move out of the VFS. The direct I/O
method isn't called from the VFS anywhere, but just from the
generic_file_* routines in filemap.c, which suggest doing the O_DIRECT
check in there as well.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists