[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABPqkBR+SOVzKjaP4oiapPbS2x+pheooVF=6qL15VVG=KuFYyw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 18:21:05 +0100
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, acme@...hat.com,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, mingo@...e.hu, paulus@...ba.org,
cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf, tool: Fix the array pointer to follow event data properly
Yes, and I haven't heard back since then
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 5:00 PM, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> wrote:
> Stephane submitted a similar patch a week ago:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/17/91
>
> David
>
>
> On 3/24/12 8:19 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>>
>> Currently we dont update the 'array' pointer properly after
>> processing the RAW data. This way perf might report wrong data
>> for branch stack if it is used along with tracepoint sample.
>>
>> I'm not sure tracepoint could be connected with branch stack,
>> but I think the array pointer should have correct value after
>> each sample processing.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa<jolsa@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 1 +
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
>> index d9da62a..56a96896 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
>> @@ -580,6 +580,7 @@ int perf_event__parse_sample(const union perf_event
>> *event, u64 type,
>> return -EFAULT;
>>
>> data->raw_data = (void *) pdata;
>> + array = (u64 *)(((char *)array) + data->raw_size +
>> sizeof(u32));
>> }
>>
>> if (type& PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK) {
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists