[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120324041752.GE2450@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 21:17:52 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] RCU changes for v3.4
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 07:00:28PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > This is what I get on a 32-bit build, according to objdump:
> >
> > 24e3: 64 ff 05 00 00 00 00 incl %fs:0x0
>
> You do? I'm surprised:
That would be because I forgot the needed "git commit --amend" before
doing "git show HEAD". :-/
See below for the patch including the most recent changes.
> > +static inline void __rcu_read_lock(void)
> > +{
> > + __raw_get_cpu_var(rcu_read_lock_nesting)++;
> > + barrier(); /* Keep code within RCU read-side critical section. */
> > +}
>
> This looks wrong.
>
> It should use "this_cpu_inc(rcu_read_lock_nesting)", I don't even see
> how you get gcc to generate that "inc %fs:" without it.
>
> In general, I don't think you should ever use the __raw_get_cpu_var() things.
I must admit that __this_cpu_inc() would be nicer than __this_cpu_add(),
though, will fix. I need the leading "__" to avoid disabling preemption
needlessly on non-x86 platforms. The reason that the "__raw" forms are
safe in this case is because the per-CPU variable is saved and restored
at context-switch time.
Or am I still missing something here?
Thanx, Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/include/linux/init_task.h b/include/linux/init_task.h
index 9c66b1a..6148cd6 100644
--- a/include/linux/init_task.h
+++ b/include/linux/init_task.h
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ extern struct group_info init_groups;
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
#define INIT_TASK_RCU_PREEMPT(tsk) \
- .rcu_read_lock_nesting = 0, \
+ .rcu_read_lock_nesting_save = 0, \
.rcu_read_unlock_special = 0, \
.rcu_node_entry = LIST_HEAD_INIT(tsk.rcu_node_entry), \
INIT_TASK_RCU_TREE_PREEMPT() \
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index 9372174..fa71ccf 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
#include <linux/completion.h>
#include <linux/debugobjects.h>
#include <linux/compiler.h>
+#include <linux/percpu.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST
extern int rcutorture_runnable; /* for sysctl */
@@ -144,7 +145,19 @@ extern void synchronize_sched(void);
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
-extern void __rcu_read_lock(void);
+DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, rcu_read_lock_nesting);
+
+/*
+ * Preemptible-RCU implementation for rcu_read_lock(). Just increment
+ * the per-CPU rcu_read_lock_nesting: Shared state and per-task state will
+ * be updated if we block.
+ */
+static inline void __rcu_read_lock(void)
+{
+ __this_cpu_add(rcu_read_lock_nesting, 1);
+ barrier(); /* Keep code within RCU read-side critical section. */
+}
+
extern void __rcu_read_unlock(void);
void synchronize_rcu(void);
@@ -154,7 +167,39 @@ void synchronize_rcu(void);
* nesting depth, but makes sense only if CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU -- in other
* types of kernel builds, the rcu_read_lock() nesting depth is unknowable.
*/
-#define rcu_preempt_depth() (current->rcu_read_lock_nesting)
+#define rcu_preempt_depth() (__raw_get_cpu_var(rcu_read_lock_nesting))
+
+/*
+ * Check for a running RCU reader on the current CPU. If used from
+ * TINY_PREEMPT_RCU, works globally, as there can be but one running
+ * RCU reader at a time in that case. ;-)
+ *
+ * Returns zero if there are no running readers. Returns a positive
+ * number if there is at least one reader within its RCU read-side
+ * critical section. Returns a negative number if an outermost reader
+ * is in the midst of exiting from its RCU read-side critical section
+ *
+ * This differs from rcu_preempt_depth() in throwing a build error
+ * if used from under !CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU.
+ */
+static inline int rcu_preempt_running_reader(void)
+{
+ return __raw_get_cpu_var(rcu_read_lock_nesting);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Check for a task exiting while in a preemptible-RCU read-side
+ * critical section, clean up if so. No need to issue warnings,
+ * as debug_check_no_locks_held() already does this if lockdep
+ * is enabled. To be called from the task-exit path, and nowhere else.
+ */
+static inline void exit_rcu(void)
+{
+ if (likely(__raw_get_cpu_var(rcu_read_lock_nesting) == 0))
+ return;
+ __raw_get_cpu_var(rcu_read_lock_nesting) = 1;
+ __rcu_read_unlock();
+}
#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU */
@@ -178,9 +223,14 @@ static inline int rcu_preempt_depth(void)
return 0;
}
+static inline void exit_rcu(void)
+{
+}
+
#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU */
/* Internal to kernel */
+extern void rcu_note_context_switch_end(void);
extern void rcu_sched_qs(int cpu);
extern void rcu_bh_qs(int cpu);
extern void rcu_check_callbacks(int cpu, int user);
diff --git a/include/linux/rcutiny.h b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
index e93df77..148c6db 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcutiny.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
@@ -91,10 +91,6 @@ static inline void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(void)
{
}
-static inline void exit_rcu(void)
-{
-}
-
static inline int rcu_needs_cpu(int cpu)
{
return 0;
@@ -103,7 +99,6 @@ static inline int rcu_needs_cpu(int cpu)
#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_TINY_RCU */
void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(void);
-extern void exit_rcu(void);
int rcu_preempt_needs_cpu(void);
static inline int rcu_needs_cpu(int cpu)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcutree.h b/include/linux/rcutree.h
index e8ee5dd..782a8ab 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcutree.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcutree.h
@@ -45,18 +45,6 @@ static inline void rcu_virt_note_context_switch(int cpu)
rcu_note_context_switch(cpu);
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
-
-extern void exit_rcu(void);
-
-#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
-
-static inline void exit_rcu(void)
-{
-}
-
-#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
-
extern void synchronize_rcu_bh(void);
extern void synchronize_sched_expedited(void);
extern void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void);
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index e692aba..f24bf6a 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1275,7 +1275,7 @@ struct task_struct {
cpumask_t cpus_allowed;
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
- int rcu_read_lock_nesting;
+ int rcu_read_lock_nesting_save;
char rcu_read_unlock_special;
struct list_head rcu_node_entry;
#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU */
@@ -1868,7 +1868,7 @@ extern void task_clear_jobctl_pending(struct task_struct *task,
static inline void rcu_copy_process(struct task_struct *p)
{
- p->rcu_read_lock_nesting = 0;
+ p->rcu_read_lock_nesting_save = 0;
p->rcu_read_unlock_special = 0;
#ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
p->rcu_blocked_node = NULL;
diff --git a/kernel/rcupdate.c b/kernel/rcupdate.c
index a86f174..91b8623 100644
--- a/kernel/rcupdate.c
+++ b/kernel/rcupdate.c
@@ -51,6 +51,10 @@
#include "rcu.h"
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
+DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, rcu_read_lock_nesting);
+#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU */
+
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
static struct lock_class_key rcu_lock_key;
struct lockdep_map rcu_lock_map =
diff --git a/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h
index 22ecea0..8434e28 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h
@@ -145,25 +145,6 @@ static int rcu_cpu_blocking_cur_gp(void)
}
/*
- * Check for a running RCU reader. Because there is only one CPU,
- * there can be but one running RCU reader at a time. ;-)
- *
- * Returns zero if there are no running readers. Returns a positive
- * number if there is at least one reader within its RCU read-side
- * critical section. Returns a negative number if an outermost reader
- * is in the midst of exiting from its RCU read-side critical section
- *
- * Returns zero if there are no running readers. Returns a positive
- * number if there is at least one reader within its RCU read-side
- * critical section. Returns a negative number if an outermost reader
- * is in the midst of exiting from its RCU read-side critical section.
- */
-static int rcu_preempt_running_reader(void)
-{
- return current->rcu_read_lock_nesting;
-}
-
-/*
* Check for preempted RCU readers blocking any grace period.
* If the caller needs a reliable answer, it must disable hard irqs.
*/
@@ -522,21 +503,25 @@ void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(void)
* grace period, then the fact that the task has been enqueued
* means that current grace period continues to be blocked.
*/
+ t->rcu_read_lock_nesting_save =
+ __raw_get_cpu_var(rcu_read_lock_nesting);
+ __raw_get_cpu_var(rcu_read_lock_nesting) = 0;
rcu_preempt_cpu_qs();
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
/*
- * Tiny-preemptible RCU implementation for rcu_read_lock().
- * Just increment ->rcu_read_lock_nesting, shared state will be updated
- * if we block.
+ * Restore the incoming task's value for rcu_read_lock_nesting at the
+ * end of a context switch.
*/
-void __rcu_read_lock(void)
+void rcu_note_context_switch_end(void)
{
- current->rcu_read_lock_nesting++;
- barrier(); /* needed if we ever invoke rcu_read_lock in rcutiny.c */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(__raw_get_cpu_var(rcu_read_lock_nesting) != 0);
+ __raw_get_cpu_var(rcu_read_lock_nesting) =
+ current->rcu_read_lock_nesting_save;
+ barrier();
+ current->rcu_read_lock_nesting_save = 0;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__rcu_read_lock);
/*
* Handle special cases during rcu_read_unlock(), such as needing to
@@ -628,7 +613,7 @@ static noinline void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
/*
* Tiny-preemptible RCU implementation for rcu_read_unlock().
- * Decrement ->rcu_read_lock_nesting. If the result is zero (outermost
+ * Decrement rcu_read_lock_nesting. If the result is zero (outermost
* rcu_read_unlock()) and ->rcu_read_unlock_special is non-zero, then
* invoke rcu_read_unlock_special() to clean up after a context switch
* in an RCU read-side critical section and other special cases.
@@ -638,21 +623,21 @@ void __rcu_read_unlock(void)
struct task_struct *t = current;
barrier(); /* needed if we ever invoke rcu_read_unlock in rcutiny.c */
- if (t->rcu_read_lock_nesting != 1)
- --t->rcu_read_lock_nesting;
+ if (__raw_get_cpu_var(rcu_read_lock_nesting) != 1)
+ --__raw_get_cpu_var(rcu_read_lock_nesting);
else {
- t->rcu_read_lock_nesting = INT_MIN;
+ __raw_get_cpu_var(rcu_read_lock_nesting) = INT_MIN;
barrier(); /* assign before ->rcu_read_unlock_special load */
if (unlikely(ACCESS_ONCE(t->rcu_read_unlock_special)))
rcu_read_unlock_special(t);
barrier(); /* ->rcu_read_unlock_special load before assign */
- t->rcu_read_lock_nesting = 0;
+ __raw_get_cpu_var(rcu_read_lock_nesting) = 0;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
{
- int rrln = ACCESS_ONCE(t->rcu_read_lock_nesting);
+ int rln = ACCESS_ONCE(__raw_get_cpu_var(rcu_read_lock_nesting));
- WARN_ON_ONCE(rrln < 0 && rrln > INT_MIN / 2);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(rln < 0 && rln > INT_MIN / 2);
}
#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING */
}
@@ -851,22 +836,6 @@ int rcu_preempt_needs_cpu(void)
return rcu_preempt_ctrlblk.rcb.rcucblist != NULL;
}
-/*
- * Check for a task exiting while in a preemptible -RCU read-side
- * critical section, clean up if so. No need to issue warnings,
- * as debug_check_no_locks_held() already does this if lockdep
- * is enabled.
- */
-void exit_rcu(void)
-{
- struct task_struct *t = current;
-
- if (t->rcu_read_lock_nesting == 0)
- return;
- t->rcu_read_lock_nesting = 1;
- __rcu_read_unlock();
-}
-
#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_TINY_PREEMPT_RCU */
#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_TRACE
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
index c023464..e029fc3 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(int cpu)
struct rcu_data *rdp;
struct rcu_node *rnp;
- if (t->rcu_read_lock_nesting > 0 &&
+ if (__raw_get_cpu_var(rcu_read_lock_nesting) > 0 &&
(t->rcu_read_unlock_special & RCU_READ_UNLOCK_BLOCKED) == 0) {
/* Possibly blocking in an RCU read-side critical section. */
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(int cpu)
? rnp->gpnum
: rnp->gpnum + 1);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
- } else if (t->rcu_read_lock_nesting < 0 &&
+ } else if (__raw_get_cpu_var(rcu_read_lock_nesting) < 0 &&
t->rcu_read_unlock_special) {
/*
@@ -228,21 +228,26 @@ static void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(int cpu)
* means that we continue to block the current grace period.
*/
local_irq_save(flags);
+ t->rcu_read_lock_nesting_save =
+ __raw_get_cpu_var(rcu_read_lock_nesting);
+ barrier();
+ __raw_get_cpu_var(rcu_read_lock_nesting) = 0;
rcu_preempt_qs(cpu);
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
/*
- * Tree-preemptible RCU implementation for rcu_read_lock().
- * Just increment ->rcu_read_lock_nesting, shared state will be updated
- * if we block.
+ * Restore the incoming task's value for rcu_read_lock_nesting at the
+ * end of a context switch.
*/
-void __rcu_read_lock(void)
+void rcu_note_context_switch_end(void)
{
- current->rcu_read_lock_nesting++;
- barrier(); /* needed if we ever invoke rcu_read_lock in rcutree.c */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(__raw_get_cpu_var(rcu_read_lock_nesting) != 0);
+ __raw_get_cpu_var(rcu_read_lock_nesting) =
+ current->rcu_read_lock_nesting_save;
+ barrier();
+ current->rcu_read_lock_nesting_save = 0;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__rcu_read_lock);
/*
* Check for preempted RCU readers blocking the current grace period
@@ -420,7 +425,7 @@ static noinline void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
/*
* Tree-preemptible RCU implementation for rcu_read_unlock().
- * Decrement ->rcu_read_lock_nesting. If the result is zero (outermost
+ * Decrement rcu_read_lock_nesting. If the result is zero (outermost
* rcu_read_unlock()) and ->rcu_read_unlock_special is non-zero, then
* invoke rcu_read_unlock_special() to clean up after a context switch
* in an RCU read-side critical section and other special cases.
@@ -429,22 +434,22 @@ void __rcu_read_unlock(void)
{
struct task_struct *t = current;
- if (t->rcu_read_lock_nesting != 1)
- --t->rcu_read_lock_nesting;
+ if (__raw_get_cpu_var(rcu_read_lock_nesting) != 1)
+ --__raw_get_cpu_var(rcu_read_lock_nesting);
else {
barrier(); /* critical section before exit code. */
- t->rcu_read_lock_nesting = INT_MIN;
+ __raw_get_cpu_var(rcu_read_lock_nesting) = INT_MIN;
barrier(); /* assign before ->rcu_read_unlock_special load */
if (unlikely(ACCESS_ONCE(t->rcu_read_unlock_special)))
rcu_read_unlock_special(t);
barrier(); /* ->rcu_read_unlock_special load before assign */
- t->rcu_read_lock_nesting = 0;
+ __raw_get_cpu_var(rcu_read_lock_nesting) = 0;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
{
- int rrln = ACCESS_ONCE(t->rcu_read_lock_nesting);
+ int rln = ACCESS_ONCE(__raw_get_cpu_var(rcu_read_lock_nesting));
- WARN_ON_ONCE(rrln < 0 && rrln > INT_MIN / 2);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(rln < 0 && rln > INT_MIN / 2);
}
#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING */
}
@@ -668,11 +673,11 @@ static void rcu_preempt_check_callbacks(int cpu)
{
struct task_struct *t = current;
- if (t->rcu_read_lock_nesting == 0) {
+ if (!rcu_preempt_running_reader()) {
rcu_preempt_qs(cpu);
return;
}
- if (t->rcu_read_lock_nesting > 0 &&
+ if (rcu_preempt_running_reader() > 0 &&
per_cpu(rcu_preempt_data, cpu).qs_pending)
t->rcu_read_unlock_special |= RCU_READ_UNLOCK_NEED_QS;
}
@@ -969,22 +974,6 @@ static void __init __rcu_init_preempt(void)
rcu_init_one(&rcu_preempt_state, &rcu_preempt_data);
}
-/*
- * Check for a task exiting while in a preemptible-RCU read-side
- * critical section, clean up if so. No need to issue warnings,
- * as debug_check_no_locks_held() already does this if lockdep
- * is enabled.
- */
-void exit_rcu(void)
-{
- struct task_struct *t = current;
-
- if (t->rcu_read_lock_nesting == 0)
- return;
- t->rcu_read_lock_nesting = 1;
- __rcu_read_unlock();
-}
-
#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
static struct rcu_state *rcu_state = &rcu_sched_state;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 5255c9d..d4b14c5 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3221,6 +3221,8 @@ need_resched:
post_schedule(rq);
+ rcu_note_context_switch_end();
+
preempt_enable_no_resched();
if (need_resched())
goto need_resched;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists