[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F6D504B.4000101@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 21:40:43 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
CC: eric.piel@...mplin-utc.net, vojcek@...n.pl, dsdt@...gusch.at,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>, lenb@...nel.org,
robert.moore@...el.com, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: Implement overriding of arbitrary ACPI tables via
initrd
On 03/23/2012 08:02 PM, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> Whatabout Multiboot(2):
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiboot_Specification
> http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/multiboot/multiboot.html
>
> They do it similar to 2, but without specifying the data of the
> files like you do with type.
>
> It's a bigger thing, but I could imagine there are some guys who would
> be willing to give it a try. I remember I googled a multiboot patch
> which got submitted to lkml long time ago.
>
> It has it pros and cons, but should show up in such a discussion.
>
Unfortunately Multiboot is defective in way too many ways, beginning
with its insistence of entering past the firmware point of no return,
which means the bootloader has to do a lot of work (this has been proven
to be a nonworkable solution) and no support for relocation.
So that is not an option.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists