linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ep93xx: Implement double buffering for M2M DMA channels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120324073207.GD5812@mwesterb-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Sat, 24 Mar 2012 09:32:07 +0200
From:	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@....fi>
To:	H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@...ionengravers.com>
Cc:	Rafal Prylowski <prylowski@...asoft.pl>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"vinod.koul@...el.com" <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
	"rmallon@...il.com" <rmallon@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ep93xx: Implement double buffering for M2M DMA channels

On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 11:09:50AM -0500, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> On Friday, March 23, 2012 12:05 AM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 09:19:10PM -0500, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> >
> >> Did you test this patch or just review it?
> >
> > I tested and reviewed it.
> 
> OK. What kernel? My tests so far have been with 3.3.

3.3 and -next.

> >> On my system it doesn't work. I think it has something to do with the
> >> changes to m2m_hw_interrupt but I haven't tracked it down yet.
> >> 
> >> It looks like what's missing is a:
> >> 
> >> 	edmac->edma->hw_submit(edmac);
> >> 
> >> But, maybe that's not needed with double buffering?
> >
> > Did you try without your patch and adding my VIC hack? That's what I did when
> > I first got this patch and I saw no problems. I tested with audio (M2P),
> > mmc_spi (M2M) and dmatest (M2M).
> 
> No, I have not applied your VIC hack.

Please try it. The point there was that we have a problem in ep93xx VIC/DMA
code but it is totally different thing and not related to Rafal's patch. We
can sort the VIC thing out separately IMHO. ep93xx dma in 3.3 is broken
regardless this patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/