[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F6E9C51.9000406@zytor.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 21:17:21 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
CC: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>, eric.piel@...mplin-utc.net,
vojcek@...n.pl, dsdt@...gusch.at, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>, lenb@...nel.org,
robert.moore@...el.com, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Harald Hoyer <harald@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: Implement overriding of arbitrary ACPI tables via
initrd
On 03/24/2012 03:21 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> The attached cpio-parsing code compiles to 458 bytes on x86-64 and 476
> bytes on i386, and that is without any library dependencies at all.
> Again, it will completely stop at the first compressed data item, so any
> such kernel objects absolutely will have to be first. In good Linux
> tradition, it is also completely untested.
>
> However, given that very reasonable size I would think that this is a
> reasonable approach. Anyone who has a better suggestion for the
> namespace than "kernel/"?
>
The more I think about it the more I really think this is the right
approach. For microcode, this means we don't have to worry about
creating a super-container for the various microcode formats; we can
simply have:
kernel/x86/microcode/GenuineIntel
kernel/x86/microcode/AuthenticAMD
... which solves the problem neatly.
It does beg the question if you want to be able to have multiple:
kernel/acpi/...
... files, to make managing different tables easier, or is that overkill?
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists