[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120325123740.7cab722b@stein>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 12:37:40 +0200
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: On patch "device.h: audit and cleanup users in main include
dir"
On Mar 24 Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> [On patch "device.h: audit and cleanup users in main include dir"] On 24/03/2012 (Sat 21:21) Stefan Richter wrote:
[...]
> > struct fw_device and struct fw_unit, defined in include/firewire.h,
> > incorporate struct device.
>
> Hi Stefan,
>
> You are correct. I did read them all and check instances of device, so
> I'm not sure how I misread this file. Did you have a specific build
> that triggered a failure, or you just happened to spot it? I'm guessing
> that it gets device.h by another path and hence won't show up in build
> coverage.
I just saw the commit coming in; there is no build failure. (I should have
test-built before posting.) All files which include linux/firewire.h
evidently include linux/device.h before it.
> If so I'll definitely get it fixed, but I might wait a day or two to see
> if anything else pops up, if it isn't explicitly causing any breakage.
If you don't receive any issues with the rest of your tree-wide commit,
just do nothing and I will add a trivial firewire.h correction myself for
the next merge window.
> > Furthermore, the inline function definitions
> > fw_device,
> > fw_unit,
> > fw_unit_get,
> > fw_unit_put,
> > fw_parent_device
> > all require definitions from linux/device.h.
Correcting myself: Only the the latter three of these use linux/device.h.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-===-- --== ==--=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists