[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1332750960.16159.81.camel@twins>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 10:36:00 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: sched: Avoid SMT siblings in select_idle_sibling() if possible
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 21:02 +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
>
> Now the more interesting VM scenario:
>
More interesting for whoem? I still think virt is an utter waste of
time ;-)
> tip tip + patch
>
> volano 1 1.29 (29% improvement)
> sysbench [n3] 1 2 (100% improvement)
> tbench 1 [n4] 1 1.07 (7% improvement)
> tbench 8 [n5] 1 1.26 (26% improvement)
> httperf [n6] 1 1.05 (5% improvement)
> Trade 1 1.31 (31% improvement)
That smells like there's more to the story, a 100% improvement is too
much..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists