[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1332760077.19804.98.camel@vkoul-udesk3>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:37:57 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Alexandre Bounine <alexandre.bounine@....com>,
paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
samuel@...tiz.org, lrg@...com, perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, fabio.estevam@...escale.com,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] dmaengine: add context parameter fixups
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 12:01 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 04:18:26PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
>
> > But we don't want the clients to use this additional parameter or be
> > exposed to it if not required. Every client is expected to use the
> > dmaengine wrappers for prepare and not invoke .device_ callbacks.
>
> Are those wrappers present in what's gone to Linus' tree, and can
> someone please send a patch to convert to using them?
Yes that are already there :-)
I will send sound specific update now
--
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists