linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] rtc/spear: Add Device Tree probing capability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:09:50 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...com>
To:	Stefan Roese <sr@...x.de>
Cc:	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org" 
	<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	Rajeev KUMAR <rajeev-dlh.kumar@...com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"rtc-linux@...glegroups.com" <rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>,
	"a.zummo@...ertech.it" <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
	spear-devel <spear-devel@...t.st.com>,
	"viresh.linux@...il.com" <viresh.linux@...il.com>,
	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc/spear: Add Device Tree probing capability

On 3/26/2012 5:02 PM, Stefan Roese wrote:
>> > +	rtc@...00000 {
>> > +		compatible = "st,spear-rtc";
> With Rob's comments in mind, wouldn't it be better to use a more specific 
> compatible property? Should we stick with "st,spear600-rtc"? Or use "st-
> spear300-rtc" as "oldest" SoC variant?

Can name it spear600-rtc then.

-- 
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/