[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F705586.5020905@st.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:09:50 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...com>
To: Stefan Roese <sr@...x.de>
Cc: "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Rajeev KUMAR <rajeev-dlh.kumar@...com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"rtc-linux@...glegroups.com" <rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>,
"a.zummo@...ertech.it" <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
spear-devel <spear-devel@...t.st.com>,
"viresh.linux@...il.com" <viresh.linux@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc/spear: Add Device Tree probing capability
On 3/26/2012 5:02 PM, Stefan Roese wrote:
>> > + rtc@...00000 {
>> > + compatible = "st,spear-rtc";
> With Rob's comments in mind, wouldn't it be better to use a more specific
> compatible property? Should we stick with "st,spear600-rtc"? Or use "st-
> spear300-rtc" as "oldest" SoC variant?
Can name it spear600-rtc then.
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists