[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4875438356E7CA4A8F2145FCD3E61C0B2CC34CAD1C@MEP-EXCH.meprolight.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:30:05 +0200
From: Alex Gershgorin <alexg@...rolight.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"marc.reilly@...il.com" <marc.reilly@...il.com>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"fabio.estevam@...escale.com" <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] regmap: Add 24 bits support
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] regmap: Add 24 bits support
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 04:40:08PM +0200, Alex Gershgorin wrote:
> This patch adds support for PMIC who use regmap and 24 bit registers
> For example MC13892, the patch was tested on i.MX35-PDK
> >A similar patch from Marc Reilly has already been applied. You don't
> >have his signoff here but then...
Sorry Marc, I missed the patch
> +typedef struct { __u8 b[3]; } __be24;
> > ...you're adding stuff like this to the regmap headers which *clearly*
> > isn't regmap specific so this looks like a separate development.
You right,
I think it makes no sense to fix it,
why do we need two similar patches
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists