linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] x86, olpc: add debugfs interface for EC commands

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4F70E042.4020703@zytor.com>
Date:	Mon, 26 Mar 2012 14:31:46 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Daniel Drake <dsd@...top.org>, mingo@...hat.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dilinger@...ued.net, pgf@...top.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] x86, olpc: add debugfs interface for EC commands

On 03/26/2012 02:29 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>
>> v4: really fix sign-off tags
> 
> s/fix/break/?  "Originally-from" is not a recognised tag.  If this code
> is based upon an earlier version from Paul then Signed-off-by: is
> correct.
> 
> What's going on here?  What are you trying to communicate?

I have been using "Originally-by:" (not Originally-from:) to indicate
content originally written by someone else which has then been
dramatically redone.  It seems to communicate, but probably should be
written into a spec somewhere.

It doesn't make much sense to put that after a Signed-off-by: though
(lines are supposed to be in chronological order.)

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/