linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the battery tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120327084700.3f32dcbf3bba4319944a726b@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Tue, 27 Mar 2012 08:47:00 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Arun Murthy <arun.murthy@...ricsson.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the battery tree

On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 08:44:14 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> I have moved the battery tree to after the mfd tree in my merge sequence
> so we will see if that helps.  I really hate having ordering dependencies
> in linux-next (since they change over time and people have to remember to
> tell me and to send stuff to Linus in the right order).  Also, it means
> that you are not testing exactly what you are sending to me - I assume
> that your testing must be including the mfd tree somehow.

And, if anyone else is using your tree as a base for development, they
must also know about this dependency ...

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped