linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] proc: fix mount -t proc -o AAA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120326153546.c1525462.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:35:46 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz <a.miskiewicz@...il.com>
Cc:	Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: fix mount -t proc -o AAA

On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 09:24:06 +0200
Arkadiusz Mi__kiewicz <a.miskiewicz@...il.com> wrote:

> > I redid the changelog:
> > 
> > 
> > From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
> > Subject: proc: fix mount -t proc -o AAA
> > 
> > The proc_parse_options() call from proc_mount() runs only once at boot
> > time.  So on any later mount attempt, any mount options are ignored
> > because ->s_root is already initialized.
> > 
> > As a consequence, "mount -o remount,<options>" will ignore the options.
> 
> So this changelog doesn't match what I saw.

So could someone please send a changelog which *does* match what you
saw?  The original remains incomprehensible :(



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/