[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1332723569.2359.16.camel@hebo>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:59:29 +0800
From: "he, bo" <bo.he@...el.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foudation.org, mingo@...e.hu, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, william.douglas@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] enable dumpstack() to printk log level
On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 13:22 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * he, bo <bo.he@...el.com> wrote:
>
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
> > @@ -177,20 +177,29 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *sp)
> > }
Ingo,
Thanks for your kind comments. It's the 1st time for me to send patches to LKML.
There are 2 patches. I sent the 1st one to a wrong address. I will resend the 2 patches.
> >
> > /*
> > - * The architecture-independent dump_stack generator
> > + * The architecture-independent dump_stack_log_lvl generator
>
> I guess it wants to say "architecture-dependent"?
Right. I will change it to architecture-dependent.
>
> > + show_trace_log_lvl(NULL, NULL, &stack, bp, log_lvl);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dump_stack_log_lvl);
>
> this should be a _GPL export.
Yes. I will change it.
>
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dump_stack_log_lvl);
Yes. I will change it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists