[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DE8DF0795D48FD4CA783C40EC8292335105F35@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 07:29:09 +0000
From: "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@...el.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
CC: "lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"keir.xen@...il.com" <keir.xen@...il.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
"Li, Shaohua" <shaohua.li@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] RFC: Xen pad logic
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> +static struct acpi_driver xen_acpi_pad_driver = {
>> + .name = "processor_aggregator",
>> + .class = ACPI_PROCESSOR_AGGREGATOR_CLASS,
>> + .ids = xen_pad_device_ids,
>> + .ops = {
>> + .add = xen_acpi_pad_add,
>> + .remove = xen_acpi_pad_remove,
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int __init xen_acpi_pad_init(void)
>> +{
>> + return acpi_bus_register_driver(&xen_acpi_pad_driver);
>
> If the acpi_bus_register_driver function could work with multiple
> acpi_drivers that define the same class (and have some priority) would
> this be easier?
Not quite clear your point, could you elaborate more?
Thanks,
Jinsong--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists