[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120326164835.GE10236@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:48:35 -0400
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@...el.com>
Cc: "Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"keir.xen@...il.com" <keir.xen@...il.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>,
"Li, Shaohua" <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
"lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] RFC: Prepare PAD for native and xen
platform
> > Compare approaches:
> >
> > 1. xen overwritten approach (patches V2, x86_init, osl approach)
> > Pros:
> > a little simpler code
> > Cons:
> > 1). specific to xen, cannot extend to other virt platform;
> > 2). need to change natvie acpi_pad as modular;
> >
> > 2. paravirt interface approach (original patches V1)
> > Pros:
> > 1). standard hypervisor-agnostic interface (USENIX conference
> > 2006), can easily hook to Xen/lguest/... on demand; 2). arch
> > independent; 3). no need to change native acpi_pad as
> > non-modular; Cons:
> > a little complicated code, and code patching is some
> > overkilled for this case (but no harm);
> >
> > (BTW, in the future we need add more and more pv ops, like pv_pm_ops,
> > pv_cpu_hotplug_ops, pv_mem_hotplug_ops, etc. So how about add a
> > pv_misc_ops template to handle them all? seems it's a common issue).
> >
I think (and you probabaly have a better idea) is that the maintainer of
drivers/acpi/* is not very open to adding in code that only benefits Xen.
If it benefits other architectures (say ARM) then adding in hooks there
(in osl for example) makes sense - but I am not sure if ARM has a form
of _PUR code/calls it needs to do.
So with that in mind, neither of those options seems proper - as all of them
depend on changing something in drivers/acpi/*.
I've one or two suggestions of what could be done to still make this
work, but I need you to first see what happens if the native acpi_pad
runs under Xen with the latest upstream code (along with three patches
that are in a BZ I pointed you too).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists