[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1332865469.23924.129.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 12:24:29 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linaro-sched-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Geoff Levand <geoff@...radead.org>,
Gilad Ben Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <thebigcorporation@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Zen Lin <zen@...nhuawei.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/32] nohz/cpuset: Don't turn off the tick if rcu needs
it
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 11:13 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Please do not use "realtime" since I am not sure what you mean by that.
> Its for a low latency applications that cannot use "realtime" because that
> implies high latencies.
This statement totally confuses me, as the whole point of the -rt
(realtime) patch, is for lower latencies. Where do you get "realtime"
implies high latencies from?
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists