linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5]: Hibernation: lower/better control the amount of pages used for buffering

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1332888836.2040.20.camel@shrek.rexursive.com>
Date:	Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:53:56 +1100
From:	Bojan Smojver <bojan@...ursive.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5]: Hibernation: lower/better control the amount of
 pages used for buffering

On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 00:54 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> That's better, but what's wrong with a static inline, actually?

Nothing, if that is what is required to get the patch accepted. :-)

I just thought that given that nr_free_pages() is already a macro with
no side effects, it would make sense for reqd_free_pages() or
REQD_FREE_PAGES to remain a macro.

But, if you insist on static inline, I'll do static inline. Let me know.

-- 
Bojan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/