[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1332822858-14940-1-git-send-email-justinmattock@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 21:34:18 -0700
From: "Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@...il.com>
To: ddaney.cavm@...il.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
"Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2]drivers:staging:octeon Fix typos in staging:octeon
From: "Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@...il.com>
The below patch is a resend to fix some typos and comments that
I have found while reading.
Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock@...il.com>
---
drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c | 2 +-
drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-tx.c | 10 +++++-----
drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-util.h | 2 +-
drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c b/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c
index 400df8c..5699e6f 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ static inline int cvm_oct_check_rcv_error(cvmx_wqe_t *work)
/*
* We received a packet with either an alignment error
* or a FCS error. This may be signalling that we are
- * running 10Mbps with GMXX_RXX_FRM_CTL[PRE_CHK}
+ * running 10Mbps with GMXX_RXX_FRM_CTL[PRE_CHK]
* off. If this is the case we need to parse the
* packet to determine if we can remove a non spec
* preamble and generate a correct packet.
diff --git a/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-tx.c b/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-tx.c
index 56d74dc..445cdba 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-tx.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-tx.c
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@
* You can define GET_SKBUFF_QOS() to override how the skbuff output
* function determines which output queue is used. The default
* implementation always uses the base queue for the port. If, for
- * example, you wanted to use the skb->priority fieid, define
+ * example, you wanted to use the skb->priority field, define
* GET_SKBUFF_QOS as: #define GET_SKBUFF_QOS(skb) ((skb)->priority)
*/
#ifndef GET_SKBUFF_QOS
@@ -164,8 +164,8 @@ int cvm_oct_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
#endif
/*
- * Prefetch the private data structure. It is larger that one
- * cache line.
+ * Prefetch the private data structure. It is larger than the
+ * one cache line.
*/
prefetch(priv);
@@ -290,8 +290,8 @@ int cvm_oct_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
* See if we can put this skb in the FPA pool. Any strange
* behavior from the Linux networking stack will most likely
* be caused by a bug in the following code. If some field is
- * in use by the network stack and get carried over when a
- * buffer is reused, bad thing may happen. If in doubt and
+ * in use by the network stack and gets carried over when a
+ * buffer is reused, bad things may happen. If in doubt and
* you dont need the absolute best performance, disable the
* define REUSE_SKBUFFS_WITHOUT_FREE. The reuse of buffers has
* shown a 25% increase in performance under some loads.
diff --git a/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-util.h b/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-util.h
index 144fb99..2da5ce1 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-util.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-util.h
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ static inline void *cvm_oct_get_buffer_ptr(union cvmx_buf_ptr packet_ptr)
}
/**
- * INTERFACE - convert IPD port to locgical interface
+ * INTERFACE - convert IPD port to logical interface
* @ipd_port: Port to check
*
* Returns Logical interface
diff --git a/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet.c b/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet.c
index 9112cd8..4d70acf 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet.c
@@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ static void cvm_oct_common_set_multicast_list(struct net_device *dev)
/* Force accept multicast packets */
control.s.mcst = 2;
else
- /* Force reject multicat packets */
+ /* Force reject multicast packets */
control.s.mcst = 1;
if (dev->flags & IFF_PROMISC)
--
1.7.5.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists