[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120328113808.GB23005@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 12:38:08 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@...il.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arun Murthy <arun.murthy@...ricsson.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the battery tree
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 05:03:50PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> But for such drivers I usually give my 'Acked-by' so that
> patches could be merged via single tree (i.e. mfd). But nobody
> asked me in this case.
Well, for completely new MFDs there's no need as the dependency on the
core will generally sort everything out. It's only adding things to an
existing MFD that might have some issues.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists