| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:53:36 +0200 From: Heinz Diehl <htd@...cy-poultry.org> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] BFS CPU scheduler version 0.420 AKA "Smoking" for linux kernel 3.3.0 On 28.03.2012, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > CFS: ALSA XRUNs in JACK. > BFS: much less ALSA XRUNs in JACK BFS runs on all of my machines, and I know why. But that's not the point here. Why do people not accept and learn from each other? I'm quite shure that both CFS and BFS has good and bad things, why not take the best from both of them and improve it further? Just my 5ΓΈ. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists