[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F732FE0.1070708@yahoo.es>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 23:36:00 +0800
From: Hein_Tibosch <hein_tibosch@...oo.es>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC: Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com>, FlorianSchandinat@....de,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
spock@...too.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] video:uvesafb: Fix oops that uvesafb try to execute NX-protected
page
On 3/27/2012 9:32 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:01:36 +0800
> Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> Ok! I try to check pcibios_enabled first, but get some opposition by Alan Cox,
>> but I want to make thing work and fix the oops, so I choice the simple way to
>> check the (__supported_pte_mask & _PAGE_NX) instead of to check this variable plus
>> pci kernel boot parameter, pci mmconfig works or not, and more, and more. It is not
>> the best method, but it works and maybe all will feel happy.
> Okay let me ask the obvious question - why is it not the best method ?
>
> Apart from adding a helper in the includes for the arch code of
>
> static inline is_nx_enabled(void)
> {
> return !!(__supported_pte_mask & _PAGE_NX);
> }
>
> is there anything else it lacks ?
maybe giving this inline function a return type ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists