Message-ID: <4F7342D0.1010706@xenotime.net>
Date:	Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:56:48 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 26 (usbcore)

On 03/26/2012 01:16 PM, Greg KH wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 04:06:59PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
>> On Mon, 26 Mar 2012, Greg KH wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 09:58:36AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>> On 03/25/2012 09:28 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Reminder: please do not add stuff destined for v3.5 to linux-next
>>>>> included trees/branches until after v3.4-rc1 has been released.
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes since 20120323:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> on x86_64:
>>>>
>>>> ERROR: "utf16s_to_utf8s" [drivers/usb/core/usbcore.ko] undefined!
>>>> ERROR: "usb_speed_string" [drivers/usb/core/usbcore.ko] undefined!
>>>>
>>>> Full randconfig file is attached.
>>>
>>> Odd, nothing in the usb core has changed in a while in this area,
>>> although we might have gotten some core dependancies mixed up for random
>>> configurations like this.
>>
>> This is puzzling.
>>
>> 	utf16s_to_utf8s is defined in fs/nls/nls_base.c,
>> 	which is built according to CONFIG_NLS (in fs/nls/Makefile),
>> 	which is selected by CONFIG_USB (in drivers/usb/Kconfig).
>>
>> But the config that Randy attached had CONFIG_USB set to M and 
>> CONFIG_NLS not set.  How is that possible?
>>
>> 	usb_speed_string is defined in drivers/usb/usb-common.c,
>> 	which is built according to CONFIG_USB_COMMON (in
>> 		drivers/usb/Makefile),
>> 	which defaults to Y if CONFIG_USB_SUPPORT and either
>> 		CONFIG_USB or CONFIG_USB_GADGET is set (in 
>> 		drivers/usb/Kconfig).
>>
>> The problem here was that CONFIG_USB_SUPPORT isn't set but CONFIG_USB
>> is set to M.  This used not to be possible, since CONFIG_USB was
>> defined inside an "if USB_SUPPORT" section.  Maybe that got changed and
>> needs to be fixed (but
>> https://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git thinks
>> it's still not possible).  Or maybe Randy's tree is a little out of 
>> date.
> 
> Yeah, that is strange, thanks for looking into it.
> 
> Randy, any thoughts?


It's weird.  The same config file builds successfully on
linux-next of Mar. 27.

I looked more at linux-next of Mar. 26 and found one problem:
in drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig, there is a "select USB" that should be
protected by "depends on USB_ARCH_HAS_HCD".  I did that and then
kconfig complained about unmet dependencies in drivers/gpu/drm/udl/Kconfig,
so I added the same "depends on" there.  That led into an awful mess:

drivers/video/Kconfig:36:error: recursive dependency detected!
drivers/video/Kconfig:36:	symbol FB is selected by DRM_KMS_HELPER
drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig:26:	symbol DRM_KMS_HELPER is selected by DRM_UDL
drivers/gpu/drm/udl/Kconfig:1:	symbol DRM_UDL depends on USB_ARCH_HAS_HCD
drivers/usb/Kconfig:78:	symbol USB_ARCH_HAS_HCD depends on USB_ARCH_HAS_OHCI
drivers/usb/Kconfig:24:	symbol USB_ARCH_HAS_OHCI depends on I2C
drivers/i2c/Kconfig:5:	symbol I2C is selected by FB_DDC
drivers/video/Kconfig:86:	symbol FB_DDC is selected by FB_CYBER2000_DDC
drivers/video/Kconfig:385:	symbol FB_CYBER2000_DDC depends on FB_CYBER2000
drivers/video/Kconfig:373:	symbol FB_CYBER2000 depends on FB

and I don't know what to do with this.

Anyway, I do think that the problem is in drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig
and drivers/gpu/drm/udl/Kconfig.


-- 
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists