[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEnQRZD+0AQFfFCzWZCR5JR0BUxxNEsincD+_O9F0ne2Zryp_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 23:08:00 +0300
From: Daniel Baluta <dbaluta@...acom.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Flavio Leitner <fbl@...hat.com>
Cc: Alexandru Copot <alex.mihai.c@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, jmorris@...ei.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
kaber@...sh.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: bind() use stronger condition for bind_conflict
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 10:52 -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote:
>> On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 00:11:52 +0300
>> Alexandru Copot <alex.mihai.c@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>
>> > diff --git a/net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c
>> > index 02dd203..dfc8bc3 100644
>> > --- a/net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c
>> > +++ b/net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c
>> > @@ -28,7 +28,8 @@
>> > #include <net/inet6_connection_sock.h>
>> >
>> > int inet6_csk_bind_conflict(const struct sock *sk,
>> > - const struct inet_bind_bucket *tb)
>> > + const struct inet_bind_bucket *tb,
>> > + int relax)
>>
>> Same here
>> Maybe you can wait for more feedbacks before spin another patch
>> version just to fix that.
>>
>
>
>
> Also 'int relax' should be 'bool relax'... 1/0 -> true/false
>
> Anyway net-next is not open yet...
Eric, Flavio, thanks a lot for your comments. We will resubmit this
when net-next opens.
Please let us know if you have any other observations.
thanks,
Daniel.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists