linux-kernel - Re: [rfc] fcntl: Add F_GETOWNER

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:30:44 -0500
From:	Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc] fcntl: Add F_GETOWNER_UIDS option

Quoting Oleg Nesterov (oleg@...hat.com):
> On 03/28, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> >
> > If you want to
> > just add the struct cred to the f_owner and do proper uid conversion,
> > I'll support that too.  (Just grab a ref to the cred in
> > fs/fcntl.c:f_modown(), and drop the ref in fs/file_table.c:__fput() ).
> 
> In this case f_owner.*uid should go away, I guess.

Yup.

Which I guess is all the more reason *not* to do this unless we end up
not going with Eric's userns mapping patchset (which is unlikely).

> And sigio_perm()
> should be unified with kill_ok_by_cred() somehow (modulo
> security_file_send_sigiotask).
> 
> Right?

Maybe, but other differences include current being the signal sender in
one and recipient in the other, and CAP_KILL being relevent in only
one.

-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/