[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120328223542.GA11065@localhost>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 06:35:42 +0800
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@...e.com>,
Andrea Righi <andrea@...terlinux.com>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] buffered write IO controller in balance_dirty_pages()
Hi Vivek,
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 05:10:18PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 08:13:08PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> >
> > Here is one possible solution to "buffered write IO controller", based on Linux
> > v3.3
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/linux.git buffered-write-io-controller
> >
> > Features:
> > - support blkio.weight
>
> So this does proportional write bandwidth division on bdi for buffered
> writes?
Right. That is done in patch 3, costing only 3 lines in balance_dirty_pages().
> > - support blkio.throttle.buffered_write_bps
>
> This is absolute limit systemwide or per bdi?
It's per-blkcg absolute limit. It can be extended to per-blkcg-per-bdi
limits w/o changing the basic algorithms. We only need to change interface and
vectorize the variables:
struct percpu_counter nr_dirtied;
unsigned long bw_time_stamp;
unsigned long dirtied_stamp;
unsigned long dirty_ratelimit;
unsigned long long buffered_write_bps;
and add a "bdi" parameter to relevant functions.
> [..]
> > The test results included in the last patch look pretty good in despite of the
> > simple implementation.
> >
> > [PATCH 1/6] blk-cgroup: move blk-cgroup.h in include/linux/blk-cgroup.h
> > [PATCH 2/6] blk-cgroup: account dirtied pages
> > [PATCH 3/6] blk-cgroup: buffered write IO controller - bandwidth weight
> > [PATCH 4/6] blk-cgroup: buffered write IO controller - bandwidth limit
> > [PATCH 5/6] blk-cgroup: buffered write IO controller - bandwidth limit interface
> > [PATCH 6/6] blk-cgroup: buffered write IO controller - debug trace
> >
>
> Hi Fengguang,
>
> Only patch 0 and patch 4 have shown up in my mail box. Same seems to be
> the case for lkml. I am wondering what happened to rest of the patches.
Sorry I shut down my laptop before all emails are sent out.
> Will understand the patches better once I have the full set.
OK, thanks!
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists