[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120329092532.GF4106@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:25:32 +0200
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
Yufeng Shen <miletus@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7 v6] drm/i915/intel_i2c: use INDEX cycles for i2c read
transactions
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 04:37:18PM +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:52 AM, Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 02:26:37 +0800, Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org> wrote:
> >> It is very common for an i2c device to require a small 1 or 2 byte write
> >> followed by a read. For example, when reading from an i2c EEPROM it is
> >> common to write and address, offset or index followed by a reading some
> >> values.
> >
> > Hmm, I have
> >
> > "gmbus1, bits 8-15: 8-bit GMBUS slave register
> > This field is redundant and should not be used."
> >
> > Scary. :)
>
> Perhaps INDEX ops are only available on some chipsets?
> Is this something you can double check?
I think index ops are available, the text sounds more like a hint to the
programmer that for VCH devices you should use word reg index access (i.e.
gmbus 5). We'll see when it blows up.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel@...ll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists