lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 12:41 +0200
From: Sven Eckelmann <sven@...fation.org>
To: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
simon.wunderlich@...03.tu-chemnitz.de,
Marek Lindner <lindner_marek@...oo.de>
Subject: Re: Using nested locking for spin_lock_bh
On Thursday, March 29, 2012 11:11:37 AM Yong Zhang wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 06:36:39PM +0200, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I started to run some experimental batman-adv code inside some virtual
> > machines with different debugging functions enabled. One of them was
> > lockdep. There we noticed a false positive for a lock class that is
> > actually used in two different data structures.
>
> Hmm, I think you can initialize the lock class in the two differnent data
> structures with differnt lock_class_key.
Thanks. I think I understand the problem now a little bit better and could
resolve it using lockdep_set_class.
Kind regards,
Sven
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists