linux-kernel - Re: Regulator supplies when using Device Tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120329111159.GJ3668@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date:	Thu, 29 Mar 2012 12:11:59 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Michael Bohan <mbohan@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	rnayak@...com, lrg@...com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Regulator supplies when using Device Tree

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 05:06:48PM -0700, Michael Bohan wrote:

> Are you aware of any other examples of submitted drivers with Device
> Tree support that implement regulator devices that optionally have
> an upstream supply? I looked at your tree recently and couldn't see
> any such cases.

No, pretty much any drivers which optionally have an upstream supply
would be buggy and should therefore run into trouble during review.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)