[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F745CFE.4070703@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 15:00:46 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/13] KVM: MMU: split FNAME(prefetch_invalid_gpte)
On 03/29/2012 11:22 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> Split FNAME(prefetch_invalid_gpte) to check gpte independently which will
> be used in the later patch
>
>
> -static bool FNAME(prefetch_invalid_gpte)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> - struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, u64 *spte,
> - pt_element_t gpte)
> +static bool FNAME(invalid_gpte)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, pt_element_t gpte)
> {
> if (is_rsvd_bits_set(&vcpu->arch.mmu, gpte, PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL))
> - goto no_present;
> + return true;
>
> if (!is_present_gpte(gpte))
> - goto no_present;
> + return true;
>
> if (!(gpte & PT_ACCESSED_MASK))
> - goto no_present;
> + return true;
>
> return false;
A comment (or a name change) is needed to indicate that we're not
checking for an invalid gpte, just invalid for caching in an spte.
> +}
>
>
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists