[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120329140525.GA10452@localhost>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 22:05:25 +0800
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memory_failure: Let the compiler add the function name
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:09:09AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > I agree with your change, but I'm not sure these should be pr_info() to
> > start with, these seem more like debugging messages? I can't see how
> > they'd be useful in standard operation so could we just convert them to be
> > debug instead?
>
> Well it tells why the page recovery didn't work.
>
> Memory recovery is a somewhat obscure path, so it's better to have
> full information.
Nod, and it won't disturb the users unless something really bad happens.
I'm fine with the patch, too.
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists