[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F74CAEA.1010606@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 13:49:46 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
Trevor Turner <turn3r.tr3v0r@...il.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: K7/Athlon Optimization Causes Build Fail on Kernel 3.3 i686
On 03/29/2012 01:46 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:28:40AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> I like this one for urgent as a quick fix, but it doesn't solve the real
>> problem which is that boot/compressed shouldn't pick up these macros at all.
>
> But it does through:
>
> <arch/x86/include/asm/string_32.h>:
>
That's the problem... it shouldn't use that.
>
>> It should be possible to build with MK7 (which is an optimization
>> option) and EFI (a functionality option) since they don't inherently
>> conflict. It just doesn't necessarily have to happen *right now*.
>
> I know, technically it is doable, but do you see a K7 box with an EFI
> firmware? I, at least, don't think so... :-)
>
> Now, if you think that those optimizations could be used on other boxes
> which could sport EFI, then that's a whole another question...
>
What I'm saying, mostly, is that this is indicative of a bigger bug.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists