[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFwJkN2BmZJmWfB6FU0TuVKfmh4um8pMKYVUk3aG7JkNwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 13:59:33 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: lockups shortly after booting in current git.
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu> wrote:
>
> I'd suggest restricting the bisect to fs/ first, and if that comes up
> with something non-sensical, you can always use the good/bad data
> points for a whole tree bisect.
>
> One commit that you might want to try testing is b43d17f31^, and see
> whether that works. One potential commit that might be suspicious is
> b43d17f31 given the stack trace shows one process apparently waiting
> on PageWriteback.
Ahh, that does sound interesting and relevant.
Yeah, maybe the directed approach is worth it. In fact, considering
the above commie, maybe it might be worth it to be *very* directed,
and just test that one thing first, and maybe even skip the bisection
entirely and just test a revert if it looks promising.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists