[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120330105048.GA30876@aftab>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:50:48 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>
Cc: Linux Edac Mailing List <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] edac: Create a dimm struct and move the labels
into it
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 01:45:34PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> The way a DIMM is currently represented implies that they're
> linked into a per-csrow struct. However, some drivers don't see
> csrows, as they're ridden behind some chip like the AMB's
> on FBDIMM's, for example.
>
> This forced drivers to fake a csrow struct, and to create
> a mess under csrow/channel original's concept.
>
> Move the DIMM labels into a per-DIMM struct, and add there
> the real location of the socket, in terms of csrow/channel.
> Latter patches will modify the location to properly represent the
> memory architecture.
>
> All other drivers will use a per-csrow type of location.
> Some of those drivers will require a latter conversion, as
> they also fake the csrows internally.
>
> TODO: While this patch doesn't change the existing behavior, on
> csrows-based memory controllers, a csrow/channel pair points to a memory
> rank. There's a known bug at the EDAC core that allows having different
> labels for the same DIMM, if it has more than one rank. A latter patch
> is need to merge the several ranks for a DIMM into the same dimm_info
> struct, in order to avoid having different labels for the same DIMM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>
> ---
> drivers/edac/edac_mc.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c | 11 ++++-----
> drivers/edac/i5100_edac.c | 8 +++---
> drivers/edac/i7core_edac.c | 4 +-
> drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c | 2 +-
> drivers/edac/sb_edac.c | 4 +-
> include/linux/edac.h | 28 +++++++++++++++++++----
> 7 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
> index 690cbf1..c03bfe7 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ static void edac_mc_dump_channel(struct rank_info *chan)
> debugf4("\tchannel = %p\n", chan);
> debugf4("\tchannel->chan_idx = %d\n", chan->chan_idx);
> debugf4("\tchannel->ce_count = %d\n", chan->ce_count);
> - debugf4("\tchannel->label = '%s'\n", chan->label);
> + debugf4("\tchannel->label = '%s'\n", chan->dimm->label);
> debugf4("\tchannel->csrow = %p\n\n", chan->csrow);
> }
>
> @@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_alloc(unsigned sz_pvt, unsigned nr_csrows,
> struct mem_ctl_info *mci;
> struct csrow_info *csi, *csrow;
> struct rank_info *chi, *chp, *chan;
> + struct dimm_info *dimm;
> void *pvt;
> unsigned size;
> int row, chn;
> @@ -170,7 +171,8 @@ struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_alloc(unsigned sz_pvt, unsigned nr_csrows,
> mci = (struct mem_ctl_info *)0;
> csi = edac_align_ptr(&mci[1], sizeof(*csi));
> chi = edac_align_ptr(&csi[nr_csrows], sizeof(*chi));
> - pvt = edac_align_ptr(&chi[nr_chans * nr_csrows], sz_pvt);
> + dimm = edac_align_ptr(&chi[nr_chans * nr_csrows], sizeof(*dimm));
> + pvt = edac_align_ptr(&dimm[nr_chans * nr_csrows], sz_pvt);
> size = ((unsigned long)pvt) + sz_pvt;
>
> mci = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -182,11 +184,13 @@ struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_alloc(unsigned sz_pvt, unsigned nr_csrows,
> */
> csi = (struct csrow_info *)(((char *)mci) + ((unsigned long)csi));
> chi = (struct rank_info *)(((char *)mci) + ((unsigned long)chi));
> + dimm = (struct dimm_info *)(((char *)mci) + ((unsigned long)dimm));
> pvt = sz_pvt ? (((char *)mci) + ((unsigned long)pvt)) : NULL;
>
> /* setup index and various internal pointers */
> mci->mc_idx = edac_index;
> mci->csrows = csi;
> + mci->dimms = dimm;
> mci->pvt_info = pvt;
> mci->nr_csrows = nr_csrows;
>
> @@ -205,6 +209,21 @@ struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_alloc(unsigned sz_pvt, unsigned nr_csrows,
> }
> }
>
> + /*
> + * By default, assumes that a per-csrow arrangement will be used,
> + * as most drivers are based on such assumption.
> + */
> + dimm = mci->dimms;
> + for (row = 0; row < mci->nr_csrows; row++) {
> + for (chn = 0; chn < mci->csrows[row].nr_channels; chn++) {
> + mci->csrows[row].channels[chn].dimm = dimm;
> + dimm->csrow = row;
> + dimm->csrow_channel = chn;
> + dimm++;
> + mci->nr_dimms++;
> + }
> + }
There's a double loop above this one which iterates over the same
things: rows and then channels in each row. So merge that loop with the
one above instead of repeating it here.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists