[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120330124426.GA13811@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:44:26 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Karl Pickett <kjp@...uchicago.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kay.sievers@...y.org,
Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>
Subject: Re: Is prctl(PR_SET_CHILD_SUBREAPER) going to break my code which
checks getppid == 1?
On 03/29, Karl Pickett wrote:
>
> Re: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1236479
>
> I'm wondering if this is going to break code that checks getppid() == 1?
>
> I have a TCL/TK GUI app that spawns ssh. I want the ssh to die
> immediately if the GUI process crashes, so ssh is launched with a wrapper
> c program that does:
>
> prctl(PR_SET_PDEATHSIG, SIGHUP);
> if (getppid() == 1) /* parent died already? */
> return 0;
Yes, this won't work if the parent of this app does PR_SET_CHILD_SUBREAPER.
> So what is getppid() going to return for some user using this new
> 'session manager reaper'?
The new parent's pid ;)
Perhaps you can do something like
ppid_for_child = getpid();
if (!fork()) {
// Child
prctl(PR_SET_PDEATHSIG);
if (getppid() != ppid_for_child)
return;
...
}
Just in case, I do not know how PR_SET_CHILD_SUBREAPER will be really used.
I do not know if systemd will run the "normal" user applications under
PR_SET_CHILD_SUBREAPER. Probably yes, but this is the question to Kay.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists