[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <5DA7DE7D-EF85-4EF6-9E31-5AD7D75274D8@ozlabs.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 16:24:13 +0100
From: Matt Evans <matt@...abs.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Jan Seiffert <kaffeemonster@...glemail.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION][PATCH] bpf_jit drops the ball on indirect negative mem references
Howdy Eric,
On 30 Mar 2012, at 15:08, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 15:42 +0200, Jan Seiffert wrote:
>
>> Do you know where i can ping the powerpc guys a little bit harder?
>
> maybe using CC linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
>
> One way to handle that would be to split this patch in 3 parts, so that
> I can Ack the non ppc part.
>
> [1] introduce bpf_internal_load_pointer_neg_helper()
> [BTW no need to EXPORT_SYMBOL it, since jit is not a module ]
>
> [2] x86_bpf_iit: handle negative offsets in loads
>
> [3] ppc_bpf_jit: handle negative offsets in loads
Yeah, that'd be great, then I can stew on it without holding you up further.
Cheers,
Matt
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists