[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1203301113530.22502@router.home>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:15:01 -0500 (CDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>
cc: lwoodman@...hat.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Motohiro Kosaki <mkosaki@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] do_migrate_pages() calls migrate_to_node() even if
task is already on a correct node
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> >
> > for_each_node_mask(s, tmp) {
> > +
> > + /* IFF there is an equal number of source and
> > + * destination nodes, maintain relative node distance
> > + * even when source and destination nodes overlap.
> > + * However, when the node weight is unequal, never
> > move
> > + * memory out of any destination nodes */
> > + if ((nodes_weight(*from_nodes) !=
> > nodes_weight(*to_nodes)) &&
> > + (node_isset(s, *to_nodes)))
> > + continue;
> > +
> > d = node_remap(s, *from_nodes, *to_nodes);
> > if (s == d)
> > continue;
>
> I'm confused. Could you please explain why you choose nodes_weight()? On my
> first impression,
> it seems almostly unrelated factor.
Isnt this the original code by Paul? I would think that the 1-1 movement
is only useful to do if the number of nodes in both the destination and
the source is the same.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists