| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4F75D2A5.7060407@googlemail.com> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:35:01 +0200 From: Jan Seiffert <kaffeemonster@...glemail.com> To: <netdev@...r.kernel.org> CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, "Matt Evans" <matt@...abs.org>, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net> Subject: [REGRESSION][PATCH V4 3/3] bpf jit: Let the powerpc jit handle negative offsets Now the helper function from filter.c for negative offsets is exported, it can be used it in the jit to handle negative offsets. First modify the asm load helper functions to handle: - know positive offsets - know negative offsets - any offset then the compiler can be modified to explicitly use these helper when appropriate. This fixes the case of a negative X register and allows to lift the restriction that bpf programs with negative offsets can't be jited. Signed-off-by: Jan Seiffert <kaffeemonster@...glemail.com> I have only compile tested this, -ENOHARDWARE. Can someone with more powerpc kung-fu review and maybe test this? Esp. powerpc asm is not my strong point. I think i botched the stack frame in the call setup. Help? diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_64.S b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_64.S index ff4506e..e590aa5 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_64.S +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_64.S @@ -31,14 +31,13 @@ * then branch directly to slow_path_XXX if required. (In fact, could * load a spare GPR with the address of slow_path_generic and pass size * as an argument, making the call site a mtlr, li and bllr.) - * - * Technically, the "is addr < 0" check is unnecessary & slowing down - * the ABS path, as it's statically checked on generation. */ .globl sk_load_word sk_load_word: cmpdi r_addr, 0 - blt bpf_error + blt bpf_slow_path_word_neg + .globl sk_load_word_positive_offset +sk_load_word_positive_offset: /* Are we accessing past headlen? */ subi r_scratch1, r_HL, 4 cmpd r_scratch1, r_addr @@ -51,7 +50,9 @@ sk_load_word: .globl sk_load_half sk_load_half: cmpdi r_addr, 0 - blt bpf_error + blt bpf_slow_path_half_neg + .globl sk_load_half_positive_offset +sk_load_half_positive_offset: subi r_scratch1, r_HL, 2 cmpd r_scratch1, r_addr blt bpf_slow_path_half @@ -61,7 +62,9 @@ sk_load_half: .globl sk_load_byte sk_load_byte: cmpdi r_addr, 0 - blt bpf_error + blt bpf_slow_path_byte_neg + .globl sk_load_byte_positive_offset +sk_load_byte_positive_offset: cmpd r_HL, r_addr ble bpf_slow_path_byte lbzx r_A, r_D, r_addr @@ -69,22 +72,20 @@ sk_load_byte: /* * BPF_S_LDX_B_MSH: ldxb 4*([offset]&0xf) - * r_addr is the offset value, already known positive + * r_addr is the offset value */ .globl sk_load_byte_msh sk_load_byte_msh: + cmpdi r_addr, 0 + blt bpf_slow_path_byte_msh_neg + .globl sk_load_byte_msh_positive_offset +sk_load_byte_msh_positive_offset: cmpd r_HL, r_addr ble bpf_slow_path_byte_msh lbzx r_X, r_D, r_addr rlwinm r_X, r_X, 2, 32-4-2, 31-2 blr -bpf_error: - /* Entered with cr0 = lt */ - li r3, 0 - /* Generated code will 'blt epilogue', returning 0. */ - blr - /* Call out to skb_copy_bits: * We'll need to back up our volatile regs first; we have * local variable space at r1+(BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC). @@ -136,3 +137,85 @@ bpf_slow_path_byte_msh: lbz r_X, BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(2*8)(r1) rlwinm r_X, r_X, 2, 32-4-2, 31-2 blr + +/* Call out to bpf_internal_load_pointer_neg_helper: + * We'll need to back up our volatile regs first; we have + * local variable space at r1+(BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC). + * Allocate a new stack frame here to remain ABI-compliant in + * stashing LR. + */ +#define sk_negative_common(SIZE) \ + mflr r0; \ + std r0, 16(r1); \ + /* R3 goes in parameter space of caller's frame */ \ + std r_skb, (BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME+48)(r1); \ + std r_A, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(0*8))(r1); \ + std r_X, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(1*8))(r1); \ + stdu r1, -BPF_PPC_SLOWPATH_FRAME(r1); \ + /* R3 = r_skb, as passed */ \ + mr r4, r_addr; \ + li r5, SIZE; \ + bl bpf_internal_load_pointer_neg_helper; \ + /* R3 != 0 on success */ \ + addi r1, r1, BPF_PPC_SLOWPATH_FRAME; \ + ld r0, 16(r1); \ + ld r_A, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(0*8))(r1); \ + ld r_X, (BPF_PPC_STACK_BASIC+(1*8))(r1); \ + mtlr r0; \ + cmpldi r3, 0; \ + beq bpf_error_slow; /* cr0 = EQ */ \ + mr r_addr, r3; \ + ld r_skb, (BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME+48)(r1); \ + /* Great success! */ + +bpf_slow_path_word_neg: + lis r_scratch1,-32 /* SKF_LL_OFF */ + cmpd r_addr, r_scratch1 /* addr < SKF_* */ + blt bpf_error /* cr0 = LT */ + .globl sk_load_word_negative_offset +sk_load_word_negative_offset: + sk_negative_common(4) + lwz r_A, 0(r_addr) + blr + +bpf_slow_path_half_neg: + lis r_scratch1,-32 /* SKF_LL_OFF */ + cmpd r_addr, r_scratch1 /* addr < SKF_* */ + blt bpf_error /* cr0 = LT */ + .globl sk_load_half_negative_offset +sk_load_half_negative_offset: + sk_negative_common(2) + lhz r_A, 0(r_addr) + blr + +bpf_slow_path_byte_neg: + lis r_scratch1,-32 /* SKF_LL_OFF */ + cmpd r_addr, r_scratch1 /* addr < SKF_* */ + blt bpf_error /* cr0 = LT */ + .globl sk_load_byte_negative_offset +sk_load_byte_negative_offset: + sk_negative_common(1) + lbz r_A, 0(r_addr) + blr + +bpf_slow_path_byte_msh_neg: + lis r_scratch1,-32 /* SKF_LL_OFF */ + cmpd r_addr, r_scratch1 /* addr < SKF_* */ + blt bpf_error /* cr0 = LT */ + .globl sk_load_byte_msh_negative_offset +sk_load_byte_msh_negative_offset: + sk_negative_common(1) + lbz r_X, 0(r_addr) + rlwinm r_X, r_X, 2, 32-4-2, 31-2 + blr + +bpf_error_slow: + /* fabricate a cr0 = lt */ + li r_scratch1, -1 + cmpdi r_scratch1, 0 +bpf_error: + /* Entered with cr0 = lt */ + li r3, 0 + /* Generated code will 'blt epilogue', returning 0. */ + blr + diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index 73619d3..2dc8b14 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -127,6 +127,9 @@ static void bpf_jit_build_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx) PPC_BLR(); } +#define CHOOSE_LOAD_FUNC(K, func) \ + ((int)K < 0 ? ((int)K >= SKF_LL_OFF ? func##_negative_offset : func) : func##_positive_offset) + /* Assemble the body code between the prologue & epilogue. */ static int bpf_jit_build_body(struct sk_filter *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, @@ -391,21 +394,16 @@ static int bpf_jit_build_body(struct sk_filter *fp, u32 *image, /*** Absolute loads from packet header/data ***/ case BPF_S_LD_W_ABS: - func = sk_load_word; + func = CHOOSE_LOAD_FUNC(K, sk_load_word); goto common_load; case BPF_S_LD_H_ABS: - func = sk_load_half; + func = CHOOSE_LOAD_FUNC(K, sk_load_half); goto common_load; case BPF_S_LD_B_ABS: - func = sk_load_byte; + func = CHOOSE_LOAD_FUNC(K, sk_load_byte); common_load: - /* - * Load from [K]. Reference with the (negative) - * SKF_NET_OFF/SKF_LL_OFF offsets is unsupported. - */ + /* Load from [K]. */ ctx->seen |= SEEN_DATAREF; - if ((int)K < 0) - return -ENOTSUPP; PPC_LI64(r_scratch1, func); PPC_MTLR(r_scratch1); PPC_LI32(r_addr, K); @@ -429,7 +427,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_build_body(struct sk_filter *fp, u32 *image, common_load_ind: /* * Load from [X + K]. Negative offsets are tested for - * in the helper functions, and result in a 'ret 0'. + * in the helper functions. */ ctx->seen |= SEEN_DATAREF | SEEN_XREG; PPC_LI64(r_scratch1, func); @@ -443,13 +441,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_build_body(struct sk_filter *fp, u32 *image, break; case BPF_S_LDX_B_MSH: - /* - * x86 version drops packet (RET 0) when K<0, whereas - * interpreter does allow K<0 (__load_pointer, special - * ancillary data). common_load returns ENOTSUPP if K<0, - * so we fall back to interpreter & filter works. - */ - func = sk_load_byte_msh; + func = CHOOSE_LOAD_FUNC(K, sk_load_byte_msh); goto common_load; break; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists