[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120330200112.GK755@shiny>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 16:01:12 -0400
From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs fixes and features
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:50:26PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com> wrote:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs.git for-linus
>
> This causes a new warning for me:
>
> fs/btrfs/extent_io.c: In function ‘repair_eb_io_failure’:
> fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1940:6: warning: ‘ret’ may be used
> uninitialized in this function
Interesting that my gcc doesn't warn here. Strictly speaking, gcc isn't
wrong, but num_extent_pages() will always be at least 1. This function
is new in this pull, so it can't be a conflict.
Do you want a new pull with the ret = 0 patch?
int repair_eb_io_failure(struct btrfs_root *root, struct extent_buffer
*eb,
int mirror_num)
{
struct btrfs_mapping_tree *map_tree = &root->fs_info->mapping_tree;
u64 start = eb->start;
unsigned long i, num_pages = num_extent_pages(eb->start, eb->len);
int ret;
for (i = 0; i < num_pages; i++) {
struct page *p = extent_buffer_page(eb, i);
ret = repair_io_failure(map_tree, start, PAGE_CACHE_SIZE,
start, p, mirror_num);
if (ret)
break;
start += PAGE_CACHE_SIZE;
}
return ret;
}
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists