linux-kernel - [ 059/149] hugetlbfs: avoid taking i_mutex from hugetlbfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120330194846.771612939@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:49:32 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Subject: [ 059/149] hugetlbfs: avoid taking i_mutex from hugetlbfs_read()

3.2-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

commit a05b0855fd15504972dba2358e5faa172a1e50ba upstream.

Taking i_mutex in hugetlbfs_read() can result in deadlock with mmap as
explained below

 Thread A:
  read() on hugetlbfs
   hugetlbfs_read() called
    i_mutex grabbed
     hugetlbfs_read_actor() called
      __copy_to_user() called
       page fault is triggered
 Thread B, sharing address space with A:
  mmap() the same file
   ->mmap_sem is grabbed on task_B->mm->mmap_sem
    hugetlbfs_file_mmap() is called
     attempt to grab ->i_mutex and block waiting for A to give it up
 Thread A:
  pagefault handled blocked on attempt to grab task_A->mm->mmap_sem,
 which happens to be the same thing as task_B->mm->mmap_sem.  Block waiting
 for B to give it up.

AFAIU the i_mutex locking was added to hugetlbfs_read() as per
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0707.2/3066.html to take
care of the race between truncate and read.  This patch fixes this by
looking at page->mapping under lock_page() (find_lock_page()) to ensure
that the inode didn't get truncated in the range during a parallel read.

Ideally we can extend the patch to make sure we don't increase i_size in
mmap.  But that will break userspace, because applications will now have
to use truncate(2) to increase i_size in hugetlbfs.

Based on the original patch from Hillf Danton.

Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c |   25 +++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
@@ -238,17 +238,10 @@ static ssize_t hugetlbfs_read(struct fil
 	loff_t isize;
 	ssize_t retval = 0;
 
-	mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
-
 	/* validate length */
 	if (len == 0)
 		goto out;
 
-	isize = i_size_read(inode);
-	if (!isize)
-		goto out;
-
-	end_index = (isize - 1) >> huge_page_shift(h);
 	for (;;) {
 		struct page *page;
 		unsigned long nr, ret;
@@ -256,18 +249,21 @@ static ssize_t hugetlbfs_read(struct fil
 
 		/* nr is the maximum number of bytes to copy from this page */
 		nr = huge_page_size(h);
+		isize = i_size_read(inode);
+		if (!isize)
+			goto out;
+		end_index = (isize - 1) >> huge_page_shift(h);
 		if (index >= end_index) {
 			if (index > end_index)
 				goto out;
 			nr = ((isize - 1) & ~huge_page_mask(h)) + 1;
-			if (nr <= offset) {
+			if (nr <= offset)
 				goto out;
-			}
 		}
 		nr = nr - offset;
 
 		/* Find the page */
-		page = find_get_page(mapping, index);
+		page = find_lock_page(mapping, index);
 		if (unlikely(page == NULL)) {
 			/*
 			 * We have a HOLE, zero out the user-buffer for the
@@ -279,17 +275,18 @@ static ssize_t hugetlbfs_read(struct fil
 			else
 				ra = 0;
 		} else {
+			unlock_page(page);
+
 			/*
 			 * We have the page, copy it to user space buffer.
 			 */
 			ra = hugetlbfs_read_actor(page, offset, buf, len, nr);
 			ret = ra;
+			page_cache_release(page);
 		}
 		if (ra < 0) {
 			if (retval == 0)
 				retval = ra;
-			if (page)
-				page_cache_release(page);
 			goto out;
 		}
 
@@ -299,16 +296,12 @@ static ssize_t hugetlbfs_read(struct fil
 		index += offset >> huge_page_shift(h);
 		offset &= ~huge_page_mask(h);
 
-		if (page)
-			page_cache_release(page);
-
 		/* short read or no more work */
 		if ((ret != nr) || (len == 0))
 			break;
 	}
 out:
 	*ppos = ((loff_t)index << huge_page_shift(h)) + offset;
-	mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
 	return retval;
 }
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/