[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120330194859.465007834@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:50:31 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: [ 118/149] udf: Fix deadlock in udf_release_file()
3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
commit a0391a3ae91d301c0e59368531a4de5f0b122bcf upstream.
udf_release_file() can be called from munmap() path with mmap_sem held. Thus
we cannot take i_mutex there because that ranks above mmap_sem. Luckily,
i_mutex is not needed in udf_release_file() anymore since protection by
i_data_sem is enough to protect from races with write and truncate.
Reported-by: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Reviewed-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/udf/file.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/udf/file.c
+++ b/fs/udf/file.c
@@ -201,12 +201,10 @@ out:
static int udf_release_file(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
{
if (filp->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE) {
- mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
down_write(&UDF_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
udf_discard_prealloc(inode);
udf_truncate_tail_extent(inode);
up_write(&UDF_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
- mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
}
return 0;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists