[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120330194856.095916061@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:50:14 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: [ 101/149] x86-32: Fix endless loop when processing signals for kernel tasks
3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>
commit 29a2e2836ff9ea65a603c89df217f4198973a74f upstream.
The problem occurs on !CONFIG_VM86 kernels [1] when a kernel-mode task
returns from a system call with a pending signal.
A real-life scenario is a child of 'khelper' returning from a failed
kernel_execve() in ____call_usermodehelper() [ kernel/kmod.c ].
kernel_execve() fails due to a pending SIGKILL, which is the result of
"kill -9 -1" (at least, busybox's init does it upon reboot).
The loop is as follows:
* syscall_exit_work:
- work_pending: // start_of_the_loop
- work_notify_sig:
- do_notify_resume()
- do_signal()
- if (!user_mode(regs)) return;
- resume_userspace // TIF_SIGPENDING is still set
- work_pending // so we call work_pending => goto
// start_of_the_loop
More information can be found in another LKML thread:
http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?12,457826
[1] the problem was also seen on MIPS.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1332448765.2299.68.camel@dimm
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S | 17 ++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S
@@ -99,12 +99,6 @@
#endif
.endm
-#ifdef CONFIG_VM86
-#define resume_userspace_sig check_userspace
-#else
-#define resume_userspace_sig resume_userspace
-#endif
-
/*
* User gs save/restore
*
@@ -328,10 +322,19 @@ ret_from_exception:
preempt_stop(CLBR_ANY)
ret_from_intr:
GET_THREAD_INFO(%ebp)
-check_userspace:
+resume_userspace_sig:
+#ifdef CONFIG_VM86
movl PT_EFLAGS(%esp), %eax # mix EFLAGS and CS
movb PT_CS(%esp), %al
andl $(X86_EFLAGS_VM | SEGMENT_RPL_MASK), %eax
+#else
+ /*
+ * We can be coming here from a syscall done in the kernel space,
+ * e.g. a failed kernel_execve().
+ */
+ movl PT_CS(%esp), %eax
+ andl $SEGMENT_RPL_MASK, %eax
+#endif
cmpl $USER_RPL, %eax
jb resume_kernel # not returning to v8086 or userspace
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists